Overblog Tous les blogs Top blogs Entreprenariat Tous les blogs Entreprenariat
Editer l'article Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
MENU
http://erks.over-blog.com/

erks.over-blog.com/

Publicité

Framer X 123



  1. Framer X Software
  2. Framer X Student Discount

The Framer book explains everything about using code in Framer. It shows you how to create different kinds of animations, has all the details about overrides, and teaches you how to create your own code components. This Framer course also doubles as an extended manual that you'll often refer to.

All content is always updated for the latest versions of Framer Web and Desktop.

Last update: October 21, 2020

Common: 2-in x 4-in x 12-ft; Actual: 1.5-in x 3.5-in x 12-ft. Tight grain lumber with small knots that is resistant to cupping, twisting, and bowing. High quality lumber from the Inland Northwest region in North America. A prototyping tool for designers to validate and present ideas, build quicker feedback loops, and speak the same language as developers.

'Framerbook is the hidden Framer manual I always turn to. It keeps up to date with Framer's changes and is extremely well written.'

Product Designer at Pitch

'The Framer book has always been my go-to resource when making something in Framer. It's incredible how well written the book is.'

Designer at Bose

'The Framer book is well laid out and easy to understand, especially from a developer standpoint.'

'With the Framer book, I have a reliable source which is incredibly well made. Structure and writing are just excellent.'

Freelance Interaction & UX Designer

'Seriously concise info about Framer that covers most of what you want to learn. Tes has a great way of explaining a broad range of concepts from simple to more complex.'

Framer x 123 online

UX Designer at GoDaddy Inc.

'Tes' book is my go-to resource for everything to do with Framer. The detailed explanations with accompanying code examples really helps you get to grips with Framer and React. Highly recommended!'

Simon Lucas

UX Prototyper at Channel 4

'The Framer book is like a magic cheatsheet for when I get stuck.'

Design manager

Table of contents
  1. Design Components
  2. Overrides
  3. Code Components
  4. Animation
    1. AnimationFree
    2. The Animate PropertyFree
    3. The Transition PropertyFree
    4. While Hover and While TapFree
    5. Example AnimationsFree
  5. Framer Motion
    1. Framer MotionNew
    2. Create React AppNew
    3. CodeSandboxNew
    4. Differences With the Framer APINew
    5. Automatic Layout AnimationsNew
    6. Shared Layout AnimationsNew
    7. Layout IDNew
    8. SVG AnimationsNew
  6. Smart Components
    1. Smart ComponentsFree
    2. iOS Segmented ControlFree
  7. Dragging

This video shows projects from: Animation, Property controls, and Dragging

The above video is from a while back. The Animations section, for instance, now has about twice the amount of content:

Questions? Check the FAQ.

Following 529
Likes 557
Framer x software
4 months ago
The @framer book section about Property Controls received an update:
🔹Added: Transition
🔹Added: Event Handler
🔹New String examples
🔹New Enum examples with Twemojis (🙏 @TwitterOSS!)
🔹New Fused Number examples
https://t.co/nxwxiiOWtxhttps://t.co/UBV0Ylv8n1
5 months ago
Wish I hadn't used emojis in those @framerbook prototypes, now that @framer also has users on Windows. 🤦‍♂️
Pictured: Chrome on Windows and macOS running side by side with the aid of @ParallelsMac and Mac's Split View.
(Also: sharing the project w/ myself w/ Framer's Multiplayer) https://t.co/kAMHA6yyq5
8 months ago
Big 📦 update of the Overrides chapter in the @framer X book!
🔹Using the Data object vs. useState vs. CreateStore
🔹Overriding design components (incl. their children)
🔹What to do when overrides don't work w/ code components
🔹Knowing which events to use w/ code components https://t.co/5KTIJgDwwy
10 months ago
Dropping an early Christmas present - here's a folder of all of the current example files for our Framer X users. 🤶🏻🎁🎄 Enjoy!
Download here 👉🏼 https://t.co/O17dqs2Zv9https://t.co/zr5HPJ7PSC
11 months ago
I took @benjaminnathan's excellent @framer playground 💫 animations and made a remix: all 36 animations in three versions:
🔹 Code Component
🔹 Framer Motion
🔹 Overrides
Get them here:
🗄️ https://t.co/Ny0tw0JdAR
More info & online examples:
📄 https://t.co/Gr0ueboyCXhttps://t.co/rLWwxEYj4U
1 year ago
iOS 13 introduced a ✨fresh look for the ‘segmented control'.
Here's a @framer X version:
🎁 https://t.co/yb2xR0EcB0
📍Maps & 🚶Steps prototypes that use it:
https://t.co/10zfVSBjAu
And, now in the 📘book, step-by-step instructions on how to build it:
https://t.co/fT1S4fH6mkhttps://t.co/7q5TF8h44p
A framer in the United States nailing the roof decking to prefabricated trusses using a nail gun. His tool belt and safety glasses are typical. Hearing protection and fall arrest equipment is missing.

A framer is someone who frames (shapes or gives shape to), or someone who constructs.[1]

Framer X Software

Building industry[edit]

In building construction a framer is a carpenter who assembles the major structural elements of a wood-framed building called the framing. Framers build walls out of studs, sills, and headers; build floors from joists and beams; and frame roofs using ridge poles and rafters. Timber framers are framers who work in the traditional style of timber framing with wooden joinery.

Traditional chair making industry[edit]

In the traditional chair making industry, it was the bodger who produced the turned parts of a chair and the benchman who produced the splats, side rails and other sawn parts. However it was the framer who assembled and finished the chair with the parts supplied by the bodger and benchman.[2]

Art[edit]

A framer is the person who does picture frames for paintings.

Framer X Student Discount

References[edit]

  1. ^'Framer'. def. 1. and 'Frame, v.' def. 5 and 7. Oxford English Dictionary Second Edition on CD-ROM (v. 4.0) © Oxford University Press 2009
  2. ^Jenkins, J. Geraint (1965). Traditional Country Craftmen. Stroud: Amberley Publishing. p. 123.


Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Framer&oldid=959957020'
Centrifugal Force

Title text: You spin me right round baby, right round, in a manner depriving me of an inertial reference frame. Baby.

Explanation[edit]

Black Hat has strapped James Bond to a centrifuge and claims that the centrifugal force will be lethal. Bond objects that there is no such thing, but just centripetal force. The notion of centrifugal force is a common one, as we experience it whenever we turn. Teachers will initially teach Newtonian mechanics in an inertial frame, and in inertial frames, the centrifugal force is zero. Instead, a body that moves in a circle does so because of a centripetal force (acting towards the centre of the rotation). This is a reasonable (and correct) view, but it is a subtle point that many students find hard to grasp, as it seems to contradict their personal experience of centrifugal forces. For the sake of exposition, teachers may claim that 'There is no such thing as centrifugal force.' This, however, is also a misconception, which is addressed in the explanation below:

Observers' point of view (Black Hat, us, etc.)
James Bond is moving in a circle, and is therefore accelerating. The force keeping him there is an inward force of contact against the centrifuge, a centripetal force. Via Newton's third law, since the centrifuge is pushing Bond inward, Bond is pushing the centrifuge outward. The centrifuge's material is strong enough not to break under this force, however.
James Bond's point of view
In James Bond's frame of reference, Bond is at rest. He is kept there by two forces: the above-mentioned inward force of contact against the centrifuge, and an outward centrifugal force. He feels both forces.

Quark download. As mentioned in the explanation, as the centrifuge rotates faster, the forces needed to keep him in motion get larger, so the force he feels gets larger. This will eventually kill him. The conclusion will be the same regardless of which frame of reference is chosen.

Teachers of mechanics are well aware of this; however, in introductory expositions, these ideas are often not taught. In theoretical mechanics, one describes the positions and velocities of the particles in a model relative to a frame of reference. This means that a time is chosen to be time 0, and positions are chosen to be (0,0,0), (1,0,0), (0,1,0), and (0,0,1). With these chosen, the position and time of any particle in the system can be described. It is an axiom of Newtonian Mechanics that there exist 'Inertial Frames.' In an inertial frame, a particle will remain at rest or at a constant speed unless acted on by an external force, and Newton's second law takes a simple form: F = ma. The surface of the Earth approximates an inertial frame. In a non-inertial frame, such as one rotating with a giant centrifuge, or moving with an accelerating vehicle, a particle will accelerate, relative to the frame. Newton's second law, when formed in such a frame, is much more complicated, as it has terms for the linear acceleration of the frame, the angular acceleration of the frame, the centrifugal force, and the Coriolis force. These extra terms are sometimes called 'fictitious forces,' as they result from the choice of the frame of reference. The mathematics required to describe problems in a non-inertial frame is more sophisticated, and all problems may be solved using an inertial frame. Thus is reasonable that teachers at school level 'lie to children' and teach the mechanics in inertial frames.

James Bond was almost killed by a centrifuge in Moonraker. The final statement by Black Hat is that said by Auric Goldfinger in Goldfinger in response to James Bond's question 'Do you expect me to talk?'

The title text is inspired by Dead or Alive's famous song from 1985, 'You Spin Me Round.'

Randall feels very strongly that the centrifugal force is a real thing. He links to this comic in the first footnote of his What if? article One-Second Day and the 6th footnote of Earth-Moon Fire Pole, stating that it is a real thing, and that he will go so far as to strap arguers to a centrifuge that he or someone he knows apparently owns.

As can also be seen in the footnote on page 132 in his What if? book, he will even fight you about it. From the book:
'Furthermore, if you're on the equator, you're being flung outward by a centrifugal force1.'
'1Yes, centrifugal. I will fight you.'
(The article itself is about what happens if you lose all your DNA, so it has not much to do with this 'real' force.. The sentence is just stating that the actual weight loss from losing all your DNA is similar to the weight loss you would experience by moving from the poles to the equator due to this force.)

Transcript[edit]

[James Bond, drawn as Cueball, is strapped to a giant wheel suspended from the ceiling. Black Hat is standing next to two levers.]
Black hat: How do you like my centrifuge, mister Bond? When I throw this lever, you will feel centrifugal force crush every bone in your body.
[Same scene, but a closer shot.]
Bond: You mean centripetal force. There's no such thing as centrifugal force.
Black hat: A laughable claim, mister Bond, perpetuated by overzealous teachers of science. Simply construct Newton's laws in a rotating system and you will see a centrifugal force term appear as plain as day.
[Closer shot, only Bond's head is visible.]
Bond: Come now, do you really expect me to do coordinate substitution in my head while strapped to a centrifuge?
Black hat: No, Mister Bond. I expect you to die.

Trivia[edit]

  • This comic is available as a signed print in the xkcd store.


add a comment!add a topic (use sparingly)!refresh comments!

Are you allowed to describe a force acting upon you when you are in an accelerating reference frame? I'm pretty sure you're not. The explanation says that from bond's point of view, he is at rest. Well, sort of. If you're in an accelerating car you can tell that you're not at rest because your inertia seems to be 'pulling' you backwards. There's nothing actually pulling you, though. 108.162.219.202 05:24, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

According to general relativity, that inertial 'pull' is indistinguishable from being at rest with a force being applied. In the rotating frame, this apparent force is the centrifugal force. 199.27.128.62 05:58, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
the explanation is correct, and you can describe forces acting on you in non-inertial frames. If you take Bond to be the origin of a rotating frame of reference then the position of Bond will be (0,0,0) at all times. So in that frame of reference, Bond is at rest (not 'sort of at rest, really at rest). The equation of motion for Bond is
(F is external force, Fe is the force due to angular acceleration of the frame (relative to some inertial frame), Fw is centrifugal force and Fc is coriolis force )
Since the sum of the three 'fictious' force are nonzero, and Bond is at rest in this frame, the force F must also be non-zero. This force F is the inward push of the centrifuge. In the moving car example, you can't tell if you are accelerating or if there is a massive graviational field pulling you backwards. From your perspective the experience is identical. If you take this idea and run with it you get general relavitity141.101.70.67 11:30, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
I believe the OP is referencing the vestibular system. This is what allows humans to feel acceleration. The actual physics at hand is regarding reference frames, not the ability of the body to detect acceleration. In regards to the question of 'Are you allowed to describe a force acting upon you when you are in an accelerating reference frame?', the answer is yes. You can pick whichever reference frame you wish, but we tend to pick the one that simplifies the calculations the most.Flewk (talk) 06:44, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

'Apparent force' is the best term to use to describe centrifugal force, and could be inserted in the text to clarify. 172.68.142.89 21:14, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

'The surface of the Earth approximates an inertial frame.'

This isn't correct at all. If you're standing on Earth, you're experiencing an acceleration of 9.8 m/s^2. 108.162.238.11 00:56, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Actually, that is incorrect. Right now i'm in my desk chair, not accelerating. The force of gravity is cancelled out by the force my chair exerts on me to maintain this status quo. You're correct that it's not an inertial frame, but that is because the force of gravity, not some acceleration141.101.77.20 12
14, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Noting that gravity _is_ an acceleration. In fact, a case could be made that it is the dominant acceleration experienced by normal matter with the possible exception of dark energy.Iggynelix (talk) 12:09, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

It's NOT appropriate that lazy science teachers 'lie to children' in that and various other ways. The kids can understand far more than the teachers assume, so that their choices of limitation are self-fulfilling prophecy, producing ignorant victims of the public school system. — Kazvorpal (talk) 01:39, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

It's also inappropriate and perhaps just as ignorant to assert that such oversimplifications only occur in _public_ schools. There are lots of private school teachers extolling the same simplification.
Retrieved from 'https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=123:_Centrifugal_Force&oldid=196633'




Publicité
Partager cet article
Repost0
Pour être informé des derniers articles, inscrivez vous :
Commenter cet article